Eligibility self-check

What problem it solves

Most people ask only whether registration will succeed. What actually determines whether the account is usable is what happens afterwards: whether local currency can reach it, whether your document type is accepted, and whether withdrawals later run into controls. All three are tied to the region, and all three are fixed at the moment you register. This puts them in one place.

How to use it

Pick a region from the dropdown. The result appears immediately. You get four things: the platform's availability status, what we saw when we queried the public peer-to-peer book, the specific limitations worth knowing, and how to verify all of it yourself.

Where the data comes from, and when

The peer-to-peer field comes from our own currency-by-currency query of public listings in August 2026. We looked at whether local payment methods were still attached to listings for each currency. That is a deliberately chosen signal: when an exchange retreats from a market, the local payment rails disappear from the book before any announcement is made.

Every region also carries what its status rests on, in one of three grades: our own look at the sign-up page and the peer-to-peer book, something stated in the platform's own public material, or media reporting alone. The third grade always shows as "needs checking yourself" — and not because we remember to mark it. It is a fixed rule of the checker: a region whose status rests only on media reports can never show a firmer answer, whatever anyone writes about it.

Each result also shows the date we last reviewed that entry. When something changes, the table and the date are what get edited, not the prose around them. You can see how old the claim is instead of guessing.

What the status levels mean

• No region-level restriction found. Nothing blocking registration that we could identify. Not a guarantee.
• Runs through a local entity — service exists, but via a separate local company with a different product range.
• No local-currency route. You may be able to register, but funding in local currency has no path.
• Policy tightening — the route works today and the regulatory direction is against it.
• Not available. The international platform does not serve this region.
• Needs checking yourself — we do not have a reliable basis for a conclusion.

The route being open is not the policy allowing it

This distinction deserves its own heading because it is where people get hurt. Listings still existing in a currency means the market is functioning. It says nothing about whether you are permitted to participate from where you live.

Vietnam is the clearest current example: the local book is active while the authorities move toward licensing only domestic platforms. We separated those two facts in the data rather than collapsing them into one status, and this site does not publish ways around any of it.

How to check it yourself, which is more current than this table

Two steps, neither requiring an account. Open the sign-up page and look for your region in the country selector. If it is absent, it is not accepted. Then open the public peer-to-peer section and filter by your local currency to see whether listings remain.

Those two checks beat any compiled table, including this one, because they read the current state directly. This tool exists to tell you what to look for and what the answer means, not to replace looking.

What it is not

Not legal advice, and not a statement about what you are permitted to do where you live. It describes what a platform appears to offer. Whether you may use it is a question about your jurisdiction, and that one is yours — see the risk notice.